Hoo boy. Not a good look AMD. It was scummy when nVidia did this, it’s scummy when you do it.

  • beefcat@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You really don’t believe AMD sponsoring these games has anything to do with it?

    Ease of implementation in most cases can’t have anything to do with it, because most games don’t even need to do any work to enable it. DLSS support is included in Unreal and Unity, right alongside FSR. They’re both just checkboxes. Being open source has nothing to do with choosing to enable one but not the other. That is much more a philosophical concern than a technical one. Trust me, as a developer, a library being proprietary means very little to us when building a video game. How much it costs to use is the much bigger factor, and from that perspective, FSR and DLSS are identical.

    AMD isn’t your friend anymore than Nvidia, they just want you to think they are because they don’t have an abusable market position yet.

    • Umbrias@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You really don’t believe AMD sponsoring these games has anything to do with it?

      I don’t think aliens are abducting people either, no. Again, you’re starting with a conclusion, finding sample biased not-even-data, and saying “see?”

      This isn’t evidence of AMD locking DLSS out. This is just someone being upset NVIDIA doesnt get special treatment all the time, because FSR is just a bigger market for developers to sink time into.

      Which by the way, for in house engines, FSR or DLSS are nontrivial dev times. Even for unity or unreal they can be nontrivial depending on your game.

      DLSS support is included in Unreal and Unity

      This is obviously so neither here nor there that it’s silly. Last I checked starfield wasn’t on unity.

      AMD isn’t your friend anymore than Nvidia

      Have I said AMD is my friend, or am I calling someone out on wild speculation with no evidence?