• lordnikon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    How about we don’t and just let original good ideas float to the top and stop all the pop culture fracking.

      • lordnikon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yeah i love that idea and hell of they want to show that new movie to the next generation just reshow it in theaters like the Drafthouse does. No need to make a special edition or whatever just shows it as is with current theater tech.

        • resipsaloquitur@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          As people love to point out, some legendary movies are remakes — eg The Wizard Of Oz and John Carpenter’s The Thing. The difference is that they’re great. And even The Wizard Of Oz had a sequel and a remake that were interesting, if not as beloved.

          Good things are good. Hot take, I know.

          • lordnikon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            The wizard of oz did have s sequel gave tons of children nightmares. Yeah if they were all good then no one would noticed. Also I think with the wizard of oz as an example it being a remake is okay becase it’s trying to be it’s own thing not sending half the movie trying to get me to point at the screen or making the movie just for the YouTubers making top 10 Easter Eggs that were big enough to roll over indy and you totally didn’t miss.

            • resipsaloquitur@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              True, the memberberries are awful. And as much as I loved Indiana Jones And The Last Crusade screenwriters have been going back to the well of “and here’s how he got his hat, here’s how he got his whip, here’s how he got that scar…” far too often. Enough already.

              • lordnikon@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                Yeah too busy on building lore to tell a good story. It’s like all writers these days are from the fanfic community.

                • resipsaloquitur@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  Right — that, or rehashing the hero’s origin story for the nth time. Or expecting you to be neck deep in a cinematic universe to understand why the audience is excited.

                  As others have pointed out, the reveal in the newer Star Trek movie that the villain’s name is Kahn means nothing if you haven’t seen a movie from the early eighties, and even then isn’t terribly interesting in and of itself.

    • JimVanDeventer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I have always been of the mind that sequels do not change how I feel about the original, no matter how terrible. Then Fight Club 2 came along and challenged my very existence to the core.

      • lordnikon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Agreed the only one that I disagree with is star wars since we can’t see the original. I have the belief that it’s isn’t just yours when you put art out there. You may own the copyright but you can’t tell me the version i enjoyed is wrong. But other than that I agree. New trek can never take away old trek. But a HD remaster of DS9 would be appreciated.

      • lordnikon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Because princess bride is perfectly fine as a film and that effort and money could be put into creating new stories instead of recycling known IP.

          • lordnikon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            I mean if you enjoy it i would never shit on your parade i just go to plays and musicals on the regular and I have noticed originals shows not based on an IP shrink smaller and smaller on the season. I think last year it was all but 3 out of 10 Hadestown , shucked, and come from away and 2 of those 3 are repeats from years prior.

    • will@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      Long damn time. If they’re basing the play on the movie (a work-for-hire), it was released in 1987, so its copyright expires in 2082 (1987 + 95). If based on the book (a sole-authorship, so author’s death + 70), William Goldman died in 2018, so the book’s copyright will expire in 2088 (2018 + 70).

  • wjrii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    You know what? Go for it. Only existing brands get adapted these days and this is a good one. The book is different from the movie and both are very wink-and-nod about the creative pursuits. Maybe it will be good. Maybe it will suck. More even than other “franchises,” a crappy musical would take nothing away from a good book and a great movie.