• Count Regal Inkwell
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “Quotas are a slippery slope to bans” to me smells the same as “affirmative action is racist”.

    Pretending that there is a slippery slope where there isn’t even a slope to begin with, and if there is, it’s sloping the other way.

    Enfranchising the disenfranchised is not the same as disenfranchising the enfranchised and never will be.

    And no, I don’t think the “current generation of tyrants” is in any way special or different. It just so happens that we are living right now, and the current sword of damocles of climate change is so transparent and all encompassing that their sacrificing of the young to maintain their spoiled lives is so damn obvious.

    But “old people in power make decision, and it is the young who pay for it” is in fact older than feudalism. Who declares the wars? The white-haired old heads in government. Who actually goes and dies in the wars? The young who are under their thrall. Who makes reckless economic decisions that lead to recessions? The old who already have property to lean back on. Who lives through those recessions and suffers without being able to afford a living? The young who had no choice. Etc. etc. etc.

    It is older than feudalism. The tyranny of the ancients is the most – Er – Ancient. Form of tyranny in humanity. Simply because having time already gives one an unfair advantage in consolidating power.

    • pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Many ancient kings who’d send people to war were themselves young or middle aged.

      And we can see on Lemmy that tons of people explicitly want politicians of a certain age to be forcibly retired, be that age 80 or 75 or 65 or whatever. You’re swinging young even by our standards. So we can conclude it is a slippery slope because it is kind of what people want, and will incrementally allow people to make what they want socially acceptable enough to pass bans completely. Which is, of course, what a slippery slope is.

      Everybody else did the same with smoking bans. We have eyes that can see and ears that can hear. Come on now.

      I don’t even necessarily disagree with you. I just want you to think about what you’re asking for.