• lysdexic@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    but I don’t understand why they don’t self-host

    Why would anyone self-host a FLOSS project? Trade secrets is not a concern, nor is it barring access to the source code repository. Why would anyone waste their resources managing a service that adds no value beyond a third-party service like GitHub?

      • lysdexic@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because Microsoft will eat your ass in your sleep

        So Microsoft has access to Firefox’s source code. So what? Isn’t the point of a FLOSS project that your source code should be made available to everyone?

        • TCB13@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Mozilla allegedly stands for a bunch of stuff that is be definition incompatible with hosting code on GitHub as it is. I bet a lot of people were expecting a lot more from them and instead got this move. Well… I guess this is like unique browser ID that each installation has or the fact that it contacts a 3rd party analytics company no matter your settings - people start by complaining and eventually even say it is right. lol so much for privacy and whatnot.

          • lysdexic@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Mozilla allegedly stands for a bunch of stuff that is be definition incompatible with hosting code on GitHub as it is.

            Your statement is fundamentally wrong on many levels, including the fact that it goes against the fundamental premise of FLOSS which is that “the users have the freedom to run, copy, distribute, study, change and improve the software.”

            I bet a lot of people were expecting a lot more from them (…)

            You only speak for yourself. You do not have a mandate to speak on behalf of anyone, including Firefox users such as myself. Keep your personal opinions as personal. You have the right to have a personal opinion, but you do not have the right to pass them off as anyone else’s.

            • TCB13@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Your statement is fundamentally wrong on many levels, including the fact that it goes against the fundamental premise of FLOSS which is tha

              What is it in my statement that goes against that? Nothing. Just read Mozilla’s Manifesto and then tell me how hosting code on GitHub doesn’t go against Principle 2, 3, 4 and 7. Mozzila’s missing is “to ensure the Internet is a global public resource, open and accessible to all” and by pushing their code on Github they’re making it more popular, essentially perpetuating Microsoft’s dominant market position that is very likely to result in even more abuse, more ecosystems and less open solutions in the future. There’s no way to justify a company with Mozilla’s resources doing this.

              • lysdexic@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Nothing. Just read Mozilla’s Manifesto

                Your trolling skills are subpar but given this is a lazy weekend I guess I’ll bite just for the entertaining value.

                Let’s go through “Principle 2, 3, 4 and 7”, shall we?

                Principle 2 The internet is a global public resource that must remain open and accessible.

                Making source code available through GitHub is a realization of Principle 2. You got it exactly backwards.

                Principle 3 The internet must enrich the lives of individual human beings.

                I don’t even know what could possess you to believe that making a software project available through GitHub would jeopardize this. Anyway.

                Principle 7 Free and open source software promotes the development of the internet as a public resource.

                That’s what making FLOSS projects available to the public through GitHub does. GitHub, by providing managed hosting to Mozilla to host Firefox’s project tree and making it available to the public, is unquestionably meeting this goal, both in its letter and its spirit.

                You need to put some effort into finding things to be outraged about.

    • Amju Wolf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Because while you do have control (and “copies”) of the source code repository, that’s not really true for the ecosystem around it - tickets, pull requests, …

      If Microsoft decided to fuck you over you’d have a hard time migrating the “community” around that source code somewhere else.

      Obviously depends on what features you are using, but for example losing all tickets would be problematic for any projects.

      Apparently Mozilla won’t be even accepting PRs there so it doesn’t matter much.

      • Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        What if you self host in AWS and Amazon decides to fuck you over? What if you decide to self from home and your ISP decides fuck you over? What if? So many what ifs… How do you even live in this world?

        • Amju Wolf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          When you use a cloud solution (and especially one with a vendor lock in like Amazon) then yeah, you are fucked there too and I’d question why you did it in the first place.

          If you have your own infrastructure - be it a server at home or whatever - then you can always just move it elsewhere, get some other ISP, whatever. There is no lock-in. Inconvenience, sure, but you can migrate elsewhere. That’s just not true about all the other things mentioned, or the friction would be much higher.

          • Aux@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Have you actually used anything cloud? Because there’s literally no friction to move things around. Unless you decide to use proprietary features.

            • Amju Wolf
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              With AWS especially there is a shitton of proprietary stuff. Most of the friction is in knowledge however; the cloud environments differ, are configured differently, have different limitations and caveats, etc. Someone who has only ever worked with AWS will have to learn a lot of things anew if they switch. Hell there’s a reason why “AWS engineer” is a dedicated role in some companies.

              Now, if you only manually set up some VMs and configure them like you would a regular server then sure, it’s easy to migrate. But when you are missing 99% of the features of the cloud environment are you actually using it?

              • Aux@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                For me the purpose of the cloud is the ability to deploy my projects on rented infrastructure independently of the provider. Tools like Terraform and Kubernetes help with the abstraction of providers.

                As for proprietary features I prefer to use open source alternatives like Supabase, which I then can deploy to any cloud and migrate between clouds if needed.

                • Amju Wolf
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Well then you aren’t probably taking advantage of most of the stuff AWS offers and is actually really good for. Which isn’t really criticism, but then I wouldn’t really call it cloud? It’s more like just infrastructure as a service.

                  • Aux@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Infrastructure as a service is literally the definition of a cloud. Everything is just bells and whistles.

      • lysdexic@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because while you do have control (and “copies”) of the source code repository, that’s not really true for the ecosystem around it - tickets, pull requests, …

        The announcement to drop Mercurial quite clearly states that their workflow won’t change and that GitHub pull requests are not considered a part of their workflow.

        Also, that’s entirely irrelevant to start with. Either you care about software freedom and software quality, or you don’t. If you care about software freedom you care about having free and unrestricted access to FLOSS projects such as Firefox, which GitHub clearly provides. If you care about software quality you’d care about the Firefox team picking the absolute best tools for the job that they themselves picked.