• Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      What’s the advantage though? What benefits does this have besides being able to read book covers written by people out of touch with their audience?

          • Nepenthe@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Fair point, but if you’re worrying about speed more than anything else, you’re probably writing quite a bit and you’re more than likely taking notes of some sort.

            The motor skills involved in writing things down by hand seems to aid memory more than typing it out does. Taka taka’s fun, faster, and not nearly as wasteful, but I’m choosing to stick with my 9,000 pens for retention

        • ChlorineAddict@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          To start, I’m pro teaching/learning cursive. To respond, my brain barely works fast enough to have letters for print, speeding up the writing isn’t the bottleneck.

        • Gork@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          1 year ago

          Signatures, not so much.

          Lots of completely illegible signatures out there lol

        • cm0002@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can read other people’s signatures

          Why would you want to

          the constitution

          Plenty of verified print versions floating out there

          notes from your older lawyer

          If I’m paying someone 100$/minute, they’d better be able to write in print upon request

      • constantokra@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I use it when writing text along side math or diagrams, to differentiate it. I write cursive notes and use print to add emphasis. It’s also much easier to write legibly at a higher speed, which I’ll admit was more important before we typed as much as we do now. My cursive is at least as legible as my printing.

      • M500@lemmy.ml
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The advantage of learning it is being able to read when other people write with it.

        I’m not saying it’s common, but it’s not hard to learn to read and I’m sure you will come across it at some point.

        • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          being able to read when other people write with it.

          They can write legibly if they want me to read what they write.

          • M500@lemmy.ml
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s not that someone is going to write something they want you to read.

            It’s more about someone wrote something and by chance you want to read it. The only problem is that it’s in cursive, you can’t.

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        For you personally? Probably not much. For us as a society? Well, being able to read our laws and history in their original form is pretty important.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not really, they’ve been transcribed and the people who need to be able to read the originals can learn just like people learn Latin if they need it, not as a mandatory language in school.

          • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Transcriptions are easy to alter. Kids learn reading and writing, and language in general much faster than adults. You can spend an hour a day for a few months with a kid and they’ll have it down pat.

            • Uranium3006@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              You really think people are gonna go down to the basement in DC and reason.the original documents and failure to read those is how we lose our rights? Stuff like the patriot act are bigger threats

              • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Future legislatures will. I don’t like the idea of nobody in our government being able to read our laws in a generation.

                Average people can view the original Constitution when taking a tour, and it’s pretty neat to be able to read the original. Like a lot of things in education, knowing them won’t necessarily be very useful, but they can provide for a richer, more fulfilling life.

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s easy to learn cursive and compare if you’re that paranoid about it (although being extremely good at reading cursive doesn’t guarantee you’ll be able to read all documents written in cursive), it doesn’t mean everyone needs to learn it.

        • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Since when did you have access to the original writing of some law? If you want to find out a law today, you go on a government website.

      • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That is how z looks in cursive.

        They’re the same thing.

        • Ech@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          I literally linked to an image showing exactly what it should look like.

          • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            That’s just a different font.
            I hope you know what fonts are.

            Edit. Apparently not, lol

            • BURN@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s the only “font” taught as cursive to Americans. I’ve never seen anything like yours referred to as cursive

            • Ech@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              Well I’m pretty sure you don’t, since handwriting doesn’t have “fonts”.