• bentropy@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Absolutely, I also think Biochar is very promising as one way to recapture atmospheric CO2 and to compensate further emissions.

    While I understood the production process to be a little different, the benefits of Biochar can’t be ignored.

    • low in energy consumption
    • low in recourse cost
    • very good scalable
    • no hidden science or process
    • the stored carbon can be used as a soil amendment
    • Mossy Feathers (She/They)
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The process may be a bit more complex than I understood, but my understanding is that the gist of it is to “burn” plant stuff in a way that doesn’t create carbon dioxide or other greenhouse gases. One way of doing that is to use a chamber flooded with nitrogen or similar inert gas. No oxygen means carbon can’t bind to two oxygen atoms to create carbon dioxide.

      • Surdon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m confused, how can you ‘burn’ anything without oxygen? Burn literally means to oxidize

        • Mossy Feathers (She/They)
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s why it’s in quotes. You’re subjecting it to high heat, which would normally cause it to burn, but because there’s no oxygen it chars instead.