Rozaŭtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 year agoJust one more rule brolemmy.caimagemessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up1489arrow-down10cross-posted to: fuckcars@lemmy.ca
arrow-up1489arrow-down1imageJust one more rule brolemmy.caRozaŭtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square14fedilinkcross-posted to: fuckcars@lemmy.ca
minus-squareDonkter@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up44·1 year agoIt’s a riff on a popular study that showed adding more lanes to reduce highway congestion can paradoxically increase congestion on those highways.
minus-squareMotoAsh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up29·edit-21 year agoand it’s also generally good allegory for using too-simple of solutions to fix problems. Throwing more y at problem x that is still alive and well with plenty of y already around is a classic failure. Hell, it’s the basis of a few fallacies.
minus-squareImplyingImplications@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up19·edit-21 year agoThe Braess Paradox, or why adding more roads increases traffic congestion and results in longer travel times.
minus-squaretheneverfoxlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·1 year agoThat was a shockingly good Wikipedia article, I vaguely knew it was a thing, but they did a good job laying out the math
It’s a riff on a popular study that showed adding more lanes to reduce highway congestion can paradoxically increase congestion on those highways.
and it’s also generally good allegory for using too-simple of solutions to fix problems. Throwing more y at problem x that is still alive and well with plenty of y already around is a classic failure. Hell, it’s the basis of a few fallacies.
The Braess Paradox, or why adding more roads increases traffic congestion and results in longer travel times.
That was a shockingly good Wikipedia article, I vaguely knew it was a thing, but they did a good job laying out the math