• Rayspekt@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’m not buying the “furry isn’t just a kink” thing at all, but please enlighten me. How does it qualify as an identity?

    • Breve
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Belonging to a fandom or other special interest community is typically something that is done through self-identification, which is different than identities that are not chosen, but still part of a broader idea of identity. There are plenty of examples of these self-chosen identities: Trekkies, Potterheads, Bronies, Cumberbitches, etc. Simply watching Star Trek doesn’t make you a Trekkie though, it’s a label people apply to themselves when they feel invested in that thing and want to be part of a community of people who feel the same. That’s all. I also hate to tell you that there are themed sex parties at Star Trek conventions too, so does that make being a Trekkie a kink? Is doing the Vulkan salute and telling someone to “live long and prosper” in public forcing that kink on others?

    • kattenluik@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      “Furry” is just yet another accepting group that is easy to get into for people who feel like they don’t belong anywhere and others. It’s quite simple and the same as many other things.

        • CarbonIceDragon
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Did they say “in the same way being trans is?” A person’s identity encompasses far more than just their gender and sexual orientation, things like hobbies or career or group affiliations are absolutely part of who a person is, so being a band member would fit. Not in the same way or for the same reason, but they didn’t say that it was.

          • Rayspekt@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            I didn’t stop reasoning. You did, as you have no answer to my ad absurdum argument lol.

            • kattenluik@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              10 months ago

              The answer to your “argument” is by the definition of identity it definitely could be, but this doesn’t matter much does it? The reason I called you unreasonable is because you seem like you’ve very clearly made up your mind and as such there’s no point talking to you especially with your seemingly bad intentions.