Hey 👋 dear Linux Community,

I’m still kinda new to Linux (started using this year 😅) I already made it to my main OS, even if I still missing some things which I used on Windows, anyway. What I wanted to ask you guys, what recommendations do you have for Linux Mint (Cinnamon)? In terms of security, optimization, (a way to make the UI looking modern ;-;) and privacy? I would be very interested in what you do guys to optimize your Linux setup :) I’m pretty technical, so there is nothing which could overwhelm me (probaly).

Thx! 🤍

#privacy #dataprotection #linux #linuxmint #opensource #foss #cybersecurity @linux

  • I don’t have the Money for MacOS, am too much of a Poweruser for ChromeOS/Android and have too much of a real life for OpenBSD

    So yes, MS is the most secure Option available.

    And that’s not my Opinion. That’s the Opinion of serious cybersecurity Experts such as Daniel Micay, the founder of GrapheneOS. He literally called it “years behind on exploit mitigation” and calls Windows more secure.

    And he’s not alone. He is joined by Madaidan, a Contributor to Tails, a security-and-privacy-focused Distro, who says you shouldn’t use (persistent) Linux unless it’s QubesOS.

    And once you read all that, suddenly the Telemetry of Windows seems like much less of an Issue.

    Linux has major Security Issues, there’s no debating that.

    The only thing we achieve with Denial is making sure these Issues will never get the Attention they deserve and as such will never get fixed.

    /rant over

    • cally [he/they]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I don’t have the Money for MacOS, am too much of a Poweruser for ChromeOS/Android and have too much of a real life for OpenBSD

      So yes, MS is the most secure Option available.

      Linux has major Security Issues, there’s no debating that.

      Windows also has security issues: on Windows, most apps are installed via the web browser. Installing apps from a website means trusting each and every website you get your software from. Of course, I imagine you could try other methods, though that’d be quite a hassle, honestly.

      Most Linux distributions have package repositories that are tested, specially point-release distros like Linux Mint or Debian.

      This is all assuming that “security” refers to how likely a system is to be compromised, hacked or otherwise affected by untrusted malware.

      The only thing we achieve with Denial is making sure these Issues will never get the Attention they deserve and as such will never get fixed.

      I never denied that Linux has security issues. There’s no way it doesn’t! The kernel is huge, as a codebase grows more and more bugs are introduced and over time they are fixed.

      I’m simply saying that, because of the way Windows works, you’re more likely to shoot yourself in the foot by installing malicious software than on Linux.