• elvith@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 months ago

      Maybe, but knowing the ease of sudo, I really hate using runas. Most of the time, I just want plain old admin privileges. Mostly I don’t care whether I can impersonate another user with this.

      • AVincentInSpace
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Given what MS did to powershell to make *nix commands like ls work (i.e. make them plain aliases to the equivalent powershell commands without any attempt to convert flags) I wouldn’t get my hopes up. (Nothing could have prepared me for the disappointment of typing ls -l and getting an error.)

        I hate to be a pessimist but $20 says they’re just making it so they can technically claim that Windows supports commands Linux users are used to and therefore that Linux users should have no trouble in a Windows environment.

      • h0rnman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        runas is trash, to be honest. I’ve been waiting 30 years for an OS-native tool that allows me to delegate specific commands for specific users to run with specific parameters as admin. Something I can do with sudo (well, sudoers) in 5 minutes is outright impossible on Windows. I’d like to believe that Microsoft will implement this part of sudo, but I’m not gonna hold my breath

    • OfficerBribe@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      runas.exe cannot start elevated process. Exceptions seem to be MMC snap-ins so you can launch something like lusrmgr.msc or devmgmt.msc with admin account and you will have admin rights.