Getting these climate superheroes into more US homes would massively cut emissions, and it would be cost-effective. Here’s how the revolution would play out.
  • CraigeryTheKid@lemm.eeEnglish
    3·
    10 months ago

    I’m building a new house soon, and looked heavily into this. Live in USDA zone 5 Midwest.

    First, like many have mention, I MUST keep gas furnace to handle the few weeks of -10F we have.

    SECOND - the cost of gas is SO CHEAP, and electricity SO HIGH - that it ALWAYS costs more to run the heat pump. Even adjusting the heat pump range.

    I couldn’t justify spending $10k more on the house, just to spend more on monthly bills.

    My gas is like $7/mmbtu, and electricity $0.20/kwh.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
      9·
      10 months ago

      Given the large number of gas export terminals already approved and under construction, I’m expecting US gas prices to at least double over the next few years, bringing them up to match the international LNG price.

      • thejevans@lemmy.ml
        8·
        10 months ago

        To add to this, I work in Oil and Gas regulation. Unless you’re in Texas, prices are gonna go up.

        • CraigeryTheKid@lemm.eeEnglish
          2·
          10 months ago

          hmm… maybe i should see just how much money switching to heat pumps is. it’ll 10-15 years before they’d need replaced naturally

    • Sonori@beehaw.org
      9·
      10 months ago

      Why does -10f mean you MUST have a gas furnace? Most modern cold temp heat pumps still have COP’s 2.5 to 3 at that ranges. Just look at the energy star database and then find a spec sheet for one of the cold wether ones.

      Secondly, look into the actual cost of the unit, the largest air source ones like you mentioned are often in the 7 to 10k range, so take that, subtract the 2k fed subsidy, then the 3 to 4k of the one way heat pump (ac) it replaced. Admittedly, if your getting multiple weeks of -10 the benefits of such a high efficiency AC probably don’t have much effect.

      Although, if your building new in zone 5, you probably should be looking at ground source rather than air source. It’s is actually a lot more expensive to lay the pipe and install, 20 to 30k, but that is a lot easier to do that before landscaping. Obviously the benefit is a lot higher efficiency at cold temperatures, given that the outside air temperature doesn’t have any significant impact on the output efficiency or capacity, as well as much lower energy useage.

      Solar is also something to poke at if you have yard space or are planning a decent roof, especially if you’re not afraid of technical documents and at forum posts to do it yourself as diy often haves the cost. Pannel and inverter prices keep coming down, to the cost will probably be better by the time you actually build. I have supper cheap electricity (10c) and still a sub ten year net profit.

      The extra 30 to 60k (depending on diy or cash grab company) is steep, but in the context of building your own house, the extra 50 to 100k for both geothermal and solar mean basically negligible utility payments for the rest of your life, outside of water if you don’t need a well, as compared to still having to pay in thirty to forty years, but now with that many years of price increases and inflation. Especially if we end up getting a carbon tax in fifteen to twenty years and utilities do what they did in Australia and massive jack up prices in protest, not that they saw anything but massive windfalls or lowered prices after it was repealed of course.

      • CraigeryTheKid@lemm.eeEnglish
        3·
        10 months ago

        actually, I did the math!

        • gas only (96% eff), plus SEER 13 A/C - annual heating/cooling $2000
        • gas + heat pump (w/ SEER 17ish) - annual heating/cooling about $2800 / yr
        • gas only again, but with solar that “matches” annual electric on cooling only - $700/yr
        • gas/heatpump/solar “do all the things” around $800/yr

        SO

        • if my goal is to spend the least amount of money over < 15 years - do nothing
        • if my goal is to spend the least amoutn of money over > 15 years - just add solar
        • if my goal is to minimize my carbon footprint at all costs - do all the things

        the “matches cooling electric” comments means that I sized the panels such that the excess generated in the summer, balances out the deficit in the winter, for solar generation of household electricity. During the winter, there’s no heating/cooling electric in the ‘gas only’ mode

        edit2

        I should mention that, while not major consumers, i AM opting for electric induction range and electric dryer, even though the builder acted like I was weird. most midwest states, outside Chicago city & maybe Minnesota or Iowa, aren’t all that progressive on this stuff

      • bruhbeans@lemmy.ml
        2·
        10 months ago

        In winter, depending on snow, latitude and the size of the system, solar may not help. I have a 6kW system, which offsets my AC use in the summer (about 1mWh generated in June and July), but I get very little at a 42 degree north latitude, usually less than 100kWh in January and December. There was one February recently where the system was covered in snow all month and I generated a goose-egg.