• Microw@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      He was on the board, it’s not like it was his project or anything. Imo he wanted to create a protocol, not a platform. “Improve Activitypub” like they always claimed. But then Bluesky realized that they can simply build their own platform and be Twitter 2.0

        • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          6 months ago

          Its community based so his opinion could be ignored, unlike when he’s on a board and his opinion was ignored.

      • heluecht@pirati.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        @Microw @dumbass No. He wouldn’t be happy with ActivityPub as well. He imagines a social network where no one can perform any moderation. He favours Nostr for exactly that reason. Bluesky has got moderation (just like the Fediverse) - which he dislikes.

          • Old_Geezer@lemmy.caOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            Moderation should always be client side. Server side should not be able to interfere or even read public content

            Yup. I don’t know if I agree re public content, but perhaps private messages should be encrypted, client side, before sending? That issue is one that bothers me about Mastodon.

        • Old_Geezer@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          No. He wouldn’t be happy with ActivityPub as well. He imagines a social network where no one can perform any moderation. He favours Nostr for exactly that reason. Bluesky has got moderation (just like the Fediverse) - which he dislikes.

          So? Like Usenet was back in the day before it became a pirate haven. Then email lists became it. LOL, People tend to ignore the extreme nut jobs regardless. I never saw any child porn on Usenet, but then I didn’t go looking for it. No doubt it existed too.

  • Dame @lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    94
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Several of you seem to be misunderstanding. When he says “like Twitter” it’s not in the negative ways you are thinking. It’s in the negative ways he’s thinking. Meaning censorship and being able to ban accounts. He doesn’t want that. Mastodon would have the same criticisms if he commented on it.

          • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            These billionaires are just regular people with less empathy (there are no ethical billionaires). They have the same braindead ideas we all have if we dont know anything about a topic and are in a talkative mood or possibly drunk or high, or all of those combined I guess.

    • delirious_owl@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Wasn’t twitter really good about banning actual Nazis and not banning journalists until Musk came along? After Musk came, Nazis were unbanned and we saw a huge wave of journalists getting banned.

      • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        6 months ago

        Before Musk, Twitters advertising was driven by engagement, and engagement was driven by encountering things that made you angry. So they were slow to respond to anything but the most egregious cases of hatred and bigotry.

      • Jennykichu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        No… NO. It was appallingly terrible at banning Nazis, worse than even Reddit in many ways. Twitter banned a tiny, tiny fraction of extremely prominent and openly fascist accounts that had been permitted to operate for years, but they ignored Nazi dogwhistles from large accounts and smaller accounts that didn’t gain a following and were used to harass 1-2 people were generally allowed to operate freely.

        Remember: they didn’t even ban Donald Trump himself until he tried to literally violently overthrow the US government. Twitter pre-Musk was an absolute shit hole, but it was at least headed in a hopeful direction. Musk kept it a shit hole and just changed the direction it was going.

  • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    bluesky has a robust moderation system which blocks transphobes, bigots, and racism which is why jack hates it.

    • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      It doesn’t block them though does it? My understanding is that it simply filters them so that you don’t see them anymore. They’re still there doing their thing though.

      • Jennykichu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        You’re correct. It doesn’t stop Nazis from having a home or building a following. It just allows users to not see it.

      • damon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        It does block them more so than on fedi. When I block someone they can’t see my content nor account, they can’t log out and go see my content. It’s not just filtered, also they have banned accounts and removed content

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Everyone on Masto/Fedi has been memeing about this since the start: Whatever platform Dorsey’s on becomes Twitter, lol.

    • Old_Geezer@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      6 months ago

      At least Dorsey is thinking about social platforms, problems. Did you even read the post or simply spouting what your tribe says in your echo chamber?

  • bquintb@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Man…no leadership, no accountability, just a rich billionaire drifter acting like he has principles. Idgaf, I like fediverse, and I like my block button…it’s the only alt I’ve found that isn’t a rightwing cess pool full of degens.

    • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      it’s meant to be twitter by ui and feel, for sure.

      i’d also say it’s meant to be more like twitter from a decade ago when twitter actually had a functioning moderation system and kept toxicity away. the moderation system, which is open sourced and allows anyone to add on to, is one of the best.

      i’m subscribed to https://bsky.app/profile/aegis.blue, which blocks or hides antisemites, bigots, racists, transphobes, you name it.

  • TomMasz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m on Bluesky and my view of it, at least, is absolutely nothing like Twitter. I’m glad he quit it before he could really turn it into another Nazi-infested hellhole.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Because — in Dorsey’s telling, at least — Bluesky was “literally repeating all the mistakes [Twitter] made as a company.”

    That’s the TLDR from an interview Dorsey conducted with journalist Mike Solana at his Pirate Wires site.

    And then Dorsey decided what he really wanted to do was help Nostr, another Twitter alternative, which promises to actually be an open-source protocol, instead.

    Dorsey, for instance, has some mostly kind words about Elon Musk, who bought Twitter in 2022.

    Though that mostly repeats his idea that Twitter’s original sin was becoming a venture-backed, for-profit company that went public with a business model based on advertising, positioned as a Facebook competitor.

    But that story/argument isn’t a new one — you can find it in this four-episode podcast series I hosted last year, for instance.


    The original article contains 349 words, the summary contains 132 words. Saved 62%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!