Tankies are just MAGA pretending to be communist

    • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      60
      ·
      3 months ago

      Jesus Christ, you’re not kidding. It’s fascinating but I feel like looking at it may have damaged me in some way.

      Stuff like this is going to happen. The more they keep inciting transphobic hatred, the more likely that a masculine woman is going to be assaulted. It’s not funny because the woman might not even be a TERF and could be completely innocent.

      Abortion and euthanasia are going to lead to autistic people being murdered. Neo progressives already believe that disabled children should be aborted and atheists admit that “life begins some time after birth” meaning they openly support euthanasia up to age five in some cases. A lot of neo progressives think the most humane option for disabled children is abortion or euthanasia at a young age.

      My sister supported abortion before she transitioned and she says that she was a creepy white knight when she supported it.

      I support raising the minimum wage, but there should be an exemption for people living with middle class parents.

      I think they are just trying to pursue viewpoint-inception in a way that deliberately will make everyone in the conversation mad at them, so they can get a high score. I cannot imagine any other explanation.

      • Lemminary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        3 months ago

        atheists admit that “life begins some time after birth” meaning they openly support euthanasia up to age five in some cases

        Pfft. I support abortion up until 99 years of age. At 100 you get a gold star and the doctor says it’s not advisable because it’ll naturally happen “any moment now”.

      • absquatulate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Holy smokes! That account has to be a bot. Awful incoherent ramblings and correct grammar just don’t mix.

    • mecfs@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      3 months ago

      Also I’ll add that this persons instance is literally a russian domain so I guess they are like a putin stooge or something

      • goat@sh.itjust.worksM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        most likely a troll.

        i’ve never heard of a tankie denying climate change since they think it puts China in a good light (despite producing the most emissions out of any country)

        • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          3 months ago

          Having a Russian domain is def an easy way to harvest the “zomg Russian shill” rage

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          I guess there’s the question of whether those on Russian division campaigns could be called “just trolls”, but they aren’t tankies. Tankies have an ideology while the Russian troll farms don’t, other than inflaming anything they possibly can to increase division and get people angry at each other.

          They simultaneously take extreme positions on any debate. Their goal isn’t to convince anyone about their extreme position other than to make readers think they are genuine, so they opposition then thinks what they are up against is more extreme and dangerous, and thus they need to escalate their own position. They want people who care about women’s rights to be at odds with people who care about men’s rights (the obvious one) and also less obvious ones like gay rights, trans rights, racial rights, hell if they can get feminists fighting with vegans, that would be a big win.

          The ultimate goal is to paralyze the culture by making it argue with extreme strawman versions of reasonable positions for every topic it can.

          • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            I guess there’s the question of whether those on Russian division campaigns could be called “just trolls”, but they aren’t tankies. Tankies have an ideology while the Russian troll farms don’t, other than inflaming anything they possibly can to increase division and get people angry at each other.

            would love to know the discerning characteristics that differentiate these populations because holy fuck when I encounter this kind of stuff my brain starts to vomit and nuances kinda get lost

            • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              There’s no real specific things that you can use to identify the troll farms.

              Tankies are pro-Russia and pro-China (and maybe others?) to the point where they believe the atrocities are justified. The part that is hard to tell about them is more whether they honestly believe that stuff as individuals and whether they are posting on their own free time or because they are hired to do so.

              At a high level, they have two different functions (assuming state sponsored troll farms vs state sponsored tankies): tankies generate positive propaganda intended to convince others to support Russia or China. Troll farms generate polarizing propaganda for or against any topic (maybe even including the tankie topic).

              Like consider the topic of feminism.

              A tankie might approach it as “everyone has a place and is valued” when talking to feminists, or “everyone knows their place and does their duties” if talking to a conservative audience. The intent is to say the area they like is good.

              A troll would talk to feminists about how evil men are and how they always cause problems, that they are all together against women. Or to conservatives about how women want to have their cake and eat it too, how feminism is about replacing the patriarchy with a matriarchy, or turning men into women. The intent is to rile up people who are already leaning that way while also making that group look scary to outsiders who see into the echo chamber.

              Those are made up examples, I’m not sure I’ve ever seen tankies talking about feminism (though I’d be extremely surprised if I’ve never seen a troll farm conversation about feminism). And often, if the topic isn’t directly related to China or Russia, they aren’t really recognizable and tbh they might actually be troll farms just doing the same thing with the topic of China or Russia… The more I think about it, the more sense it makes because they are more polarizing than effective.

              It’s deliberately not easy to follow. That frustrated “it’s too complicated, I give up on even trying to figure this out” is another one of the goals. It’s all about getting people to disengage from each other and fight each other so that there aren’t strong communities, which then compounds the problems even more.

    • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      3 months ago

      Basing your entire viewpoint as an opposition to a group will always make you look dumb. Your thoughts should be based on the most correct data you have available.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      In fairness, weather models and climate patterns have come a long way since the mid-90s. Meanwhile, folks who did have access to advanced climate data worked very hard to cover it up.

      Thankfully, the world’s largest population does appear to be taking climate change much more seriously in the 2020s than they did in the 1990s. Would that more countries took the threat of the Holocene extinction more seriously.

    • Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      3 months ago

      You don’t have to think ahead when you can just pay other people for everything without ever impacting your standard of living.

    • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think it’s even simpler than that. They’re millionaires. Why would they give a shit if their house is under water in 20 years. They’ll just get another one and stay in their other houses while they find another beach front house, and get some money back from the house insurance they can afford.

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah they have FEMA insurance so our taxes pay for it. They love taking our tax money and spending it on their excesses.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      What’s idiotic?

      If they only care about short term fulfillment/success, they are “winning”.

      Obviously long term it’s idiotic but they clearly don’t care

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Impossible. If they were stupid, how could they possibly have gotten so rich? Its not as though you can just steal billions of dollars through systemic coercion, corruption, and graft.

  • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Is anyone still actually confused about the very obvious link between tankies and right wing trolls?

        • GreyBeard@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          It took me a second to understand your picture, because for some reason, which I have just now realized, I always pictured the left on the right side of the drawn graph, and the right on the left. I have no idea why my mind drew the spectrum that way, but I had literally never questioned it until I saw your picture and thought it was backwards and realized I am the one who was backwards.

          • barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Might be because most cameras capture parliaments from behind, while left and right are from the perspective of the lectern.

  • 1stTime4MeInMCU@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 months ago

    There are plenty of conservatives on Lemmy. I don’t think it’s even pretend tankies I think some people are just straight up MAGA that found their way to a hostile part of the internet lol

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        They even have a whole community, !conservative@lemm.ee

        …or rather there’s a handful of people posting stories there just to be downvoted by random lemm.ee users browsing the local feed, often followed up by getting dissected in the comments.

        • barsquid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          That’s a great place to go if you want to argue about Southern Strategy. You can experience well-considered positions such as, “name the exact day or it is fake,” “nuh uh,” and “no, you.”

        • DroopyAtmosphere@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I tried going here. I was hoping for a post-Trump community, but that place is led by a fascist mod. His whole post history is asking for good faith arguments while delivering bad faith. The mod ACTUALLY believes the words coming out of Trump’s mouth. He’ll tell you how the crazy left is fighting for an open border and they hate our country. It’s not reality. It’s not even head-in-the-sand. It’s pure fairy tale.

      • Kaboom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        There’s like four of us. But we get down voted a lot and quickly banned from most.

        We’re not common.

          • Kaboom@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            3 months ago

            Cuz mods are shit everywhere and our views are unpopular. They will deliberately misinterprete comments, looking for awful meanings that don’t even make sense.

            • barsquid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Like how you deliberately misinterpret LGBT-themed books as being literal pornography?

              Always fun to check a regressive’s comment history and see what they’re actually crying about.

              • Kaboom@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                3 months ago

                Gender queer specifically has a picture of a blowjob. It’s explicit. It’s not meant to titalate, it’s meant to prevent the book from being put on school shelves so the author can complain conservatives are oppressing free speech.

                Most lgbtq books are fine. It’s that one specifically that keeps coming up. It’s just bait.

  • Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 months ago

    The elites are building spaceships, cities, and don’t care about the house after they are dead nor its insurability.

    • Minarble@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      They have beach houses, city pads, mountain retreats and bug out farms in NZ.

      They know climate change is real and coming they think they are rich enough to avoid the worst of it.

      They don’t give a toss about the resale value of their coastal properties.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      The elites are building spaceships

      glances at the Boeing Starliner, the Blue Origin vomit comet, and Virgin Galactic vaporware

      Idk if I’d necessarily trust these to get me to safety.

  • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    “People with money to waste wouldn’t waste money on something that will bring them joy and status in the short term.”