• Serinus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Because Mastodon needs a reliable instance with a catchy domain name. Maybe even the slightest bit of advertising.

    Someone reputable could make a real Twitter competitor for about $2m a year these days.

    I’d say Mozilla, but they just took all their social media funding away and threw it at AI. Genius.

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Which don’t exactly have the name recognition of The New York Times.

      • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        I would worry that Google will simply discontinue the product abruptly. Google is unreliable with product longevity.

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s rather see NYTimes get into it. Even if they time allow outside signups on their instance.

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’d say Mozilla, but they just took all their social media funding away and threw it at AI.

      Nobody was using their instance from what I heard. So a bit of a wasted effort.

      What sort of money are they throwing at AI? I only know about the sidebar and that’s basically just a tab to a website of your choosing. Couldn’t have been expensive.

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        They never allowed people to use it. There was a wait-list. It never opened afaik outside of Mozilla people.