• FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    8 hours ago

    As soon as the algorithm become engagement based, instead of “positive reaction” based,

    ie. algorithms now promote a post by how many reactions it has recieved, even if these reactions are negative, when it used to promote posts based on positive reaction.

    So now ragebait dominates most social media algorithms.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      algorithms now promote a post by how many reactions it has recieved, even if these reactions are negative

      ESPECIALLY if those reactions are negative. Rage and fear are THE top engagement drivers and engagement means retention means ad impressions means dollars.

      That it also means the end of democracy is immaterial to the billionaire ghouls in charge, of course.

    • SlippiHUD@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Yeah, it’s precisely why I stopped using every social media except the fediverse. It was toxic to my mental health.

      I feel safe assuming it’s been similarly toxic to everyone else’s, just some people haven’t zeroed in on that being the problem.

      • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        Even Lemmy was like this. Especially with the default comment sort “active”, which promotes comments that lead to arguments. My experience has been better since I switched to “top”.

        I still haven’t found a good post sort that works for me. “Hot” and “Scaled” literally only promote stuff posted in the past two hours. “Top” is kinda sad because you always see posts 1 day old, and “Active” has the negative engagement problem.

        The best solution I’ve found is be on an instance with downvotes disabled and sort by “active” but it isn’t perfect.

        • Sergio@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I just subscribe to communities I like, then sort by “New” to read those “Subscribed” communities. When I run out, I change to “Scaled” and “All”.

        • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I just sort by newest over 12/24 hours. I’ve found I tend to argue much less with idiots if I get in and out before the troublemakers show up.

        • NounsAndWords@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I feel the same way and now typically use “Top 6 Hours”

          …which is a actually how I found this thread.

        • Orbituary@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Thanks for the tips. I’m going to play around with it. Mine is set to hot currently, but maybe that’s not my cuppa.

        • Num10ck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          maybe we should be able to blend several of these like i’ll take 20% of top day and 30% of active and 5% controversial… lemmy would grow more of the content was more suitable.