Things didn’t end well for the last guy…

  • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    Then how come they can’t survive without leeching off a host? 80% of pregnancies spontaneously end in miscarriage. That doesn’t sound viable or fully developed to me. If it could survive outside the womb, you’d have a point. But it can’t, so you don’t.

    You know who was actually fully-developed? All the women who have died due to pregnancy complications thanks to draconic laws that take away their rights over their own bodies. I’ll hold you responsible for murdering them.

    • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      7 days ago

      You clearly don’t know biology do you & are you capable of sustaining yourself I you were left in a jungle ? BTW, it’s around 13.5 percent but regardless it’s not 80% (that’s a lie)

      • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2020)
      • National Center for Health Statistics. (1999). Trends in Pregnancies and Pregnancy Rates.
      • JAMA Network. (2020)

      I hold you responsible for the billions of deaths of unborn children, because of your stupidity & selfishness & inhumanity

      • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        You clearly don’t know biology do you

        Says the person claiming a fetus is a fully developed human.

        are you capable of sustaining yourself I you were left in a jungle ?

        Millions of people live in the jungles of the world. How many fetuses live outside wombs? Oh right, none. Because there’s a difference between having the skills to survive in the jungle, and being a fully developed human capable of independent biological survival.

        Have you ensured that every single one of your gametes resulted in a child? Then you’re a genocidal hypocrite.

      • meowMix2525@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        BTW, it’s around 13.5 percent but regardless it’s not 80% (that’s a lie)

        Sure, if you only measure after 6 weeks.

        For women of reproductive age, losses between implantation and clinical recognition are approximately 10–25%. Loss from implantation to birth is approximately one third [39, 46, 48, 49].

        A recent re-analysis [39] of data from three studies [46, 48, 49] concluded that, in normal healthy women, 10–40% is a plausible range for pre-implantation embryo loss and overall pregnancy loss from fertilisation to birth is approximately 40–60%.

        https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5443340/