• JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    “No fucking shit, Sherlock. The unstated premise of my question was that I was concerned I missed something.”

    • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      It’s the opening scene. Unless you walked into the cinema late, you’d know there was nothing to miss. If you do think you’ve missed something, just keep it to yourself and don’t ruin it for other people. You’d be surprised what you can infer from context.

  • RedSnt@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    24 hours ago

    That sentence just tickles me the right way:

    You watch it - and information is revealed

  • glitchdx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 day ago

    The opposite problem is just as annoying. Someone insisting on explaining everything about the movie as it’s happening, and causing me to miss dialogue because they won’t shut up. I have eyes, I can watch the movie.

    • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 minutes ago

      I never talk when watching a movie… unless I’m watching it on my own. If I’m on my own I can do the whole “wtf are they doing?” and laugh and swear and pause to get a snack without having to worry about disturbing anyone.

      Watching with company can be nice for the shared experience, but watching alone is good for the unencumbered relaxation.

    • morphballganon@mtgzone.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      They’re both instances of people talking when they shouldn’t, so I wouldn’t call them opposites.

      Or did you think the OP post is calling the replier a jerk? No. The point is that the asker is a moron.

  • darklamer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 day ago

    I mean, that’s literally the first line of dialogue uttered in the movie: Se til helvete å komme dere vekk. Det er ikke en bikkje! Det er en slags ting!

    • dufkm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      In a horrible accent though, at least use an actor that speaks the language or is able to mimic it well enough for a few lines.

  • branno@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    2 days ago

    I have to constantly remind my 5 year old that watching the movie explains the movie.

    At least he has the excuse that he’s… ya know… 5

  • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    There are people in my family who do this.

    Often times, it is just wait 3 minutes and the veil will be lifted the glory of knowledge will be yours.

    Other times, it is much worse, they ask the question just after the info was revealed.

    I don’t often watch movies with them.

    • nieceandtows@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      2 days ago

      My wife likes to talk during the movies(at home), and doesn’t like it when I’m too into the movie to respond to her properly. My solution is to only watch movies with her that I have already watched and liked.

      • towelie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 days ago

        My partner can’t concentrate if I talk at all, but talking (insightful/funny, concise comments at appropriate times) is a pretty normal way my friends and I watched movies growing up. Sucks lol, how am I supposed to just sit on that obvious loop hole or horribly ADR’d line for another hour and a half??

      • beastlykings@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s worse for me. If I haven’t seen it, best I can do is try hard and hope I catch all the details myself.

        If I have seen it? I can’t help but notice that my friends are distracted during the best parts of the movie. Drives me mad. Then later they’ll be like eh I guess it was ok. Ok? Ok?! You missed the best parts! Gah…

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 days ago

      My wife has a knack for talking over the exact moment that gives the answer as she’s asking the question.

  • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    My wife does the same shit. I’m always like “I do not know, I am also watching this movie in the same real time that you are.”

    • starchylemming@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      she wants to engage with you. you should state your speculations. if you’ve seen the movie already, just say something utterly outlandish to check if she actually wants to talks to you and not herself

    • dudinax@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 days ago

      My wife does the same thing, but she’ll also say an hour in “Brad Pitt is in this movie?” “Yes, dear, he’s the main character.”

      • Shapillon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’ve got some mild form of prosopagnosia (face blindness) and this happens to me all the time.

        An actor without a very recognizeable face sporting an unfamiliar haircut? I might recognize them 1h in or never at all.

        I really like the movie/serie convention of keeping the same clothes for a character. It helps me a whole lot.

  • Deconceptualist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 days ago

    I mean, unless it’s Mulholland Drive, or The Holy Mountain, or any number of other nonlinear or dream-like or psychedelic films.

  • kn0wmad1c@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    2 days ago

    The Thing (2012) really could have used a better title (and less cgi), because it isn’t a remake. It’s a prequel and tells the entire story of why the Norwegians are shooting at the dog in the beginning of The Thing (1982)

      • M137@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s obviously not even close to as good as the '82 one, but it’s definitely worth a watch. Just keep your expectations in check, not superb but not seriously bad. There’re a lot of interesting videos and articles about the making of it, and how it would have been much better without some changes that were made later in its development, so you get some cool, and sad, extra stuff after watching it.

        • Thomrade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          if I remember rightly, they had an entire props department doing the creature in the old-school way, with property and special effects, and decided in editing to replace it with CGI. Really sad. Think of how great modern physical effects could be with the advanced we made since the 80s

          • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            The worst thing was that they had a seriously bizarre alien animatronic as the pilot at the end, but they replaced it with holographic orange Tetris.

      • LouNeko@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        I watched them back to back recently. While the original is a cinematic masterpiece. In the remake/prequel you get to look at Mary Elizabeth Winstead for the whole movie, which is always great.

      • Astongt615@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        I mean, that reveal at the end (that it’s a prequel) is kinda what made the movie worth it for me. Otherwise, knowing that, it’s not nearly as enjoyable experience. But more than likely you can watch for free. So, if you like the original, why not?

        • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Damn. The first time I watched the 1982 movie, I watched it with Norwegians. They wanted to be helpful and translated the opening scene. I’m two for two on The Thing spoilers

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Not really. I went to see it back in theatres with a friend, and I remember our agreement was “The Thing influenced Dead Space, and Dead Space influenced 2012 Thing”. It’s a photocopy of a photocopy. It doesn’t have a compelling story to add, and it’s not very atmospheric.