Summary

A couple on a Qatar Airways flight from Melbourne to Doha was forced to sit next to a deceased passenger for four hours after she collapsed and died mid-flight.

The flight crew moved the woman’s body to an empty seat beside them and denied their request to change seats.

Qatar Airways apologized but did not offer the couple support after the incident.

The couple, en route to Venice, criticized the airline’s handling of the situation but are trying to continue their trip despite the distressing experience.

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      dead bodies sometimes shit or urinate themselves. and your just being hotboxed in a plane.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Is there an option to turn even more of the other passengers into bodies?

      Wait! No, don’t put me on the list -

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      I hate that your offer is appealing. But only briefly – the baby was never going to win.

    • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      110
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Keep in mind, dead people evacuate their bowels. It’s not a mummy type situation, but more of a sitting next to an open, used by concert goers, porta potty situation.

    • Thorry84@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      A baby is annoying, but they can’t really help it. I can blame the parents for bringing a baby on a long flight, but I can’t get mad at that shit.

      Kids on the other hand. I once had 4 unruly kids sitting on the row behind me and they were insane. It was a relatively short flight (6 hours), so a smaller plane with those really thin seats. The plane had the 3-3 configuration of seats, so mom, dad and the 4 kids took up the entire row.

      The kids were between 4 and 12 years old. Dad was in the corner sleeping, not giving a fuck. The two older kids (12 and 9 I think) were playing their Switches on the other side of the aisle next to dad. The two younger kids (4 and 7) were behind me with mom. Mom was in the corner with the smallest kid and they were wild. The 7 year old was constantly smashing against their tray and thus my back, kept kicking directly against my back and screaming all the time. The smallest alternated between laughing loudly and crying (shrieking more like). The smallest also stood on the tray, grabbing at my seat and head, diving in between the seat screaming PEEKABOO at full volume directly in my ear. The smallest one would also like to run in the aisle or visit the other kids, but the other one didn’t want to move so the kid snuck in between the other one and my seat.

      Mom was trying, but 4 kids on your own is a big ask. About 20 mins before we landed the two younger ones passed out and they were pretty damned cute. But in the end my back hurt, I was exhausted and deaf in one ear.

      The annoying part was, the rest of the plane was filled with old people who didn’t make a peep all flight, just sat there and read, listened and slept. But we just had to be in the worst place on the plane. Sitting behind kids may be annoying, but at least they don’t use your back as a punching bag like when you sit in front of them.

      • EddoWagt@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        56 minutes ago

        The smallest also stood on the tray, grabbing at my seat and head, diving in between the seat screaming PEEKABOO at full volume directly in my ear.

        I would’ve grabbed the kids arm and traumatised him for life

      • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        14 hours ago

        A baby is annoying, but they can’t really help it.

        I doubt the dead person had much control of the situation either.

        • toynbee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Sometimes I am reminded of a book I read as a kid wherein one of the main characters dies and is eventually resurrected. She says that when you die, you don’t lose awareness or move on, you just passively occupy the body without the ability to move (like locked-in syndrome, I guess, but I didn’t know that as a kid and don’t know whether it was even recognized back then). In particular she describes the horrors of her autopsy.

          If that were true, I wonder whether the person within the cadaver would be embarrassed to have caused such inconvenience. I know I would.

    • Lucy :3@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      100% the dead person. I’d rather jump than stay next to the baby.