• Smorty [she/her]@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
    385·
    2 days ago

    i dunno if this is the point of the post, bt im pretty sure the comic is generated…

    my reasoning, in case nayone cares:

    • painting isn’t the same in first and last panel
    • small imperfections in the ears in the second and third panel
    • second and third frame look almost identical, but are not. it doesn’t make much sense to redraw a scene when it’s exactly the same… at least to me…

    so lik— what is the point of dis post? ai image bad? i agee, bt is there another point?

    EDIT: srri if it was obvious to evrione thad the comic is fake… to me it was not, so i thought i share what i see

    • Pennomi@lemmy.worldEnglish
      221·
      2 days ago

      Yep the subversion here is that the comic itself is AI-generated. So the humor is based on the misdirection of the speaker and the fourth wall break.

      The fact that a lot of people missed this means the quality of AI images (in some cases) is finally approaching human levels of quality, further emphasizing the shock of the speaker.

      Arguments about whether or not it’s ethical aside, that is really quite the technological achievement.

      • Smorty [she/her]@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
        411·
        2 days ago

        yisyis i see it exactli lik dis. i alsuu thought thad, bt then i alsuu thought hmmmm i wondr if this is so obvious that dis is the main jok… which apparentli it is sooo it gud <3

    • setVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.caEnglish
      9·
      2 days ago

      Translation in case others struggle with reading this reply:

      I don’t know if this is the point of the post, but I’m pretty sure the comic is generated.

      My reasoning, in case anyone cares:

      • Painting isn’t the same in first and last panel
      • Small imperfections in the ears in the second and third panel
      • Second and third frame look almost identical, but are not. It doesn’t make much sense to redraw a scene when it’s exactly the same… at least to me.

      So like— what is the point of this post? AI image bad? I agree, but is there another point?

      EDIT: Sorry if it was obvious to everyone that the comic is fake… to me it was not, so I thought I share what I see.

      Given the context, it wouldn’t be surprising if the comic was at least partially AI generated.

        • setVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.caEnglish
          2·
          23 hours ago

          No, I manually replaced the words one by one with what I thought it was supposed to be, only then was I able to understand your post.

          No offense, despite your points being valid, I can’t understand your broken English as it doesn’t read out in my head.

    • ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      6·
      2 days ago

      The redrawing of the third frame is to show a pause before the response. At least that’s how I interpret it.

      Like looking at someone who is showing you something blatantly obvious as if it were new to everyone. Pausing, then responding. “Well duh”