• @theneverfox
    link
    English
    432 months ago

    I’ll never forget the one professor who put up a side of code… And had no idea what the class was about. We spent most of the class reading together with him to try to figure out what the lesson was supposed to be about

    Apparently the guy was one of those crazy low-level guys who can do things I don’t understand but build on top of. Guy just constantly looked bewildered by reality, he belonged in the code world

      • @theneverfox
        link
        English
        172 months ago

        Semaphores. It was obviously C++ code with a bunch of threads, but as it was a standalone C++ program it wasn’t really clear why it was lol

        • @jaybone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          42 months ago

          By low level guys, you mean he knew about circuits and EE? But he got stuck teaching a C++ class but he couldn’t code?

          • @theneverfox
            link
            English
            112 months ago

            By low level, I mean like kernel work. I’m told he worked on one of the 'nixes way back when.

            It was a data structures class, we did Java or Python in the into classes, php & js for Web + db basics and C++ for theory classes. Then you pick your path

            Anyways, the guy taught OS, language design, and data structures. He could code fine, he was just a terrible lecturer - extremely disorganized, no lesson plans. He only wasted the one full class forgetting why we were there, but reading his code (labeled by week) then scribbling on the whiteboard was his lecture

            I guess I ended up understanding data structures and I never fell asleep, so maybe he wasn’t a bad teacher. It was just mostly just assignments, he didn’t really do quizzes and the final wasn’t much of the grade

            • @MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 months ago

              I was thinking that you meant like, machine code, by “low level” and yeah. C wouldn’t make a lot of sense to someone who handles machine code.

              • @theneverfox
                link
                English
                22 months ago

                I’d call that hardware - if you’re code enough to the metal to be writing machine code (or even assembly), the physical architecture of the hardware is part of your code

                Low level generally is one step up - manual access to memory, compiling to an architecture rather than a virtualization layer, etc

                Strangely, the guy that taught OO theory did our hardware class, we built bit shifters and wrote programs in risc assembly… And ONE program in machine code with the promise we’d never have to do it again

                I could understand someone who writes in assembly, but machine code is a nightmare…I think I got it without any mistakes, but my butthole was clenched for 4 hours, terrified I’d have to debug it

                • @MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  22 months ago

                  Right. That’s my bad. I’m not a programmer or developer, so I conflate machine code and assembly far too frequently.

                  • @theneverfox
                    link
                    English
                    32 months ago

                    Nah, you’ve got the concepts down, I always try to drip feed this kind of information to people when it comes up.

                    It’s a lot - it takes years to absorb all of it even with a degree in it, and new concepts are always spreading. Gently correcting and being corrected is the only way

                    It’s part of the methodology my brother passed to me when I was learning - using the same terms as everyone else is critical, because if you can describe it correctly you can search it

                    And if your understandings don’t line up, you have to iron out the differences or you’ll waste time talking past each other

                    Knowing there is a difference between assembly and machine code isn’t something most people know, are you technical or interested in programming?

            • @uis@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Why data structures weren’t in C/C++? It would make sense to care about structures, cache locality, SoA/AoS, indirections and stuff in some language that compiles in native code.

              • @theneverfox
                link
                English
                32 months ago

                Ah, I phrased that ambiguously - it was in C++, all of our computing theory type classes were.

                I just got distracted realizing I graduated proficient in 9 languages and reasonably comfortable in another 3. 2 were from internships, but the rest were all from coursework. The last couple years, I was juggling 2-4 at all times, plus the odd scripts

                I always thought I was really good at picking up and switching languages, but I just realized my program was designed that way.

                That feels like a lot, do other colleges do something similar?

                (I guess you could knock off 3 because we ended up switching every semester in software engineering because cross platform apps were pretty bad at the time)

                • @jaybone@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  12 months ago

                  Once you are in the industry long enough, you won’t even remember how many different languages you have worked with.

                  A good education and experience should get you to the point where you are comfortable picking up and using any language, even if it is new to you.

                • @marcos@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  12 months ago

                  My undergrad officially required Pascal, C, C++, Java, PHP, Prolog, Lisp, x86 and MIPS assembly. You couldn’t work around those. There was also Tiger, VHDL, and Bash that were required, but you would probably not count as languages. (I’m certainly forgetting some stuff too.)

                  There was a virtual certainty you’d need some more languages, but not everybody would need the same ones.

                  • @theneverfox
                    link
                    English
                    12 months ago

                    Damn… That list sounds terrifying. I’m working on a legacy code base in VB (although I finally have time to try out this c# converter to start the slow march out of depreciation), and 8 months later I still feel gross with VB. I’m pretty sure VB is uniquely horrible because of the inconsistency. .

                    I’ve heard good things about pascal and lisp… But lisp syntax also makes me irrationally uncomfortable

                    I did prolog as well in an elective, that was a weird and interesting language. It’s not very practical, but it was fun. Plus graph theory is one of the weird maths that pops up everywhere, maybe one day I’ll find an excuse to try to use it for something

                    So it sounds like you had even more than me, I’m now wondering why even my relatively young co-workers all seemed to specialize so hard straight out of school

                    What did you end up working in? Did you specialize, or keep up with the language juggling?

        • @uis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          22 months ago

          Oh no, synchronization primitives!

          Well, you can end up implementing synchronization primitive if you are writing game. Sometimes game engine is kernel in userspace.

          • @theneverfox
            link
            English
            12 months ago

            I’ve done it in a Python system at work before. We used a mutex?(The int, not the lockout) to track worker threads

            It’s a hell of a lot easier these days… It’s amazing how quickly programming advances when you look back

            I’m interested in how this came up in a game engine though, and how recent it was